CoronaVirus/Pfizer

© Shutterstock, screenshot/Pfizer/KJN

Vaccine makers have null to lose by marketing their experimental COVID-19 shots, even if they crusade serious injury and death, as they enjoy total indemnity against injuries occurring from COVID-nineteen vaccines or any other pandemic vaccine under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, passed in the U.S. in 2005.

The total extent of their COVID-19 vaccine indemnification agreements with countries, however, is a closely guarded secret, one that has remained highly confidential — until now. A leaked document broken down by Twitter user Ehden reveals the shocking terms of Pfizer'southward international COVID-19 vaccine agreements. He wrote:

"These agreements are confidential, only luckily ane country did not protect the contract document well enough, so I managed to get a hold of a copy. As y'all are almost to meet, there is a good reason why Pfizer was fighting to hibernate the details of these contracts."

An ironclad agreement, all on Pfizer's terms

The alleged indemnification understanding, reportedly between Pfizer and Albania, was originally posted in snippets on Twitter, but Twitter now has them marked as "unavailable." Copies of the tweets are available on Treadreader, however.

The Republic of albania understanding appears very similar to another contract, published online, betwixt Pfizer and the Dominican Commonwealth. It covers not simply COVID-19 vaccines, just whatever production that enhances the use or effects of such vaccines. Countries that purchase Pfizer's COVID-19 shot must acknowledge that "Pfizer's efforts to develop and manufacture the Product" are "subject to significant risks and uncertainties."

And in the issue that a drug or other treatment comes out that can prevent, treat or cure COVID-19, the agreement stands, and the country must follow through with their club. Ivermectin , for instance, is not but safe, cheap and widely available but has been found to reduce COVID-19 mort ality by 81% . Yet, it continues to be ignored in favor of more expensive, and less effective, treatments and mass experimental vaccination. Ehden wrote:

"If you were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does non permit them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID19 the contract cannot be voided."

Even if Pfizer fails to deliver vaccine doses within their estimated delivery flow, the purchaser may not cancel the order. Farther, Pfizer can make adjustments to the number of contracted doses and their commitment schedule, "based on principles to be adamant by Pfizer," and the land buying the vaccines must "agree to any revision."

It doesn't affair if the vaccines are delivered severely late, even at a point when they're no longer needed, as information technology'south made articulate that

"Nether no circumstances will Pfizer exist subject to or liable for any tardily delivery penalties." Every bit you might suspect, the contract also "forbids returns nether any circumstances."

The big secret: Pfizer charged U.S. More Other Countries

While COVID-19 vaccines are "free" to receive in the U.S., they're beingness paid for past taxpayer dollars at a charge per unit of $xix.5011 per dose. Albania, the leaked contract revealed, paid $12 per dose, while the EU paid $14.70 per shot. While charging unlike prices to different purchases is mutual in the drug industry, information technology'southward often frowned upon.

In the example of the toll disparity betwixt the U.S. and the EU, Pfizer is said to take given a price pause to the EU because it financially supported the development of their COVID-19 vaccine. Still, Ehden noted, "U.S. taxpayers got screwed past Pfizer, probably likewise Israel." Also, Pfizer makes a indicate to note that countries have no right to withhold payment to the visitor for whatsoever reason.

Plainly, this includes in the instance of receiving damaged goods. Purchasers of Pfizer'due south COVID-19 vaccines are not entitled to pass up them "based on service complaints," unless they do not accommodate to specifications or the FDA's Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations. And, Ehden adds, "This agreement is in a higher place any local constabulary of the country."

While the purchaser has nigh no way of canceling the contract, Pfizer can terminate the agreement in the event of a "fabric alienation" of whatsoever term in their contract.

Safety and efficacy 'not currently known'

The purchaser of Pfizer'due south COVID-19 vaccine must as well acknowledge 2 facts that have largely been brushed nether the carpet: Both their efficacy and risks are unknown. According to section 5.5 of the contract:

"Purchaser acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are existence chop-chop developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will proceed to be studied after provision of the Vaccine to Purchaser under this Agreement.

"Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are non currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known."

Indemnification by the purchaser is also explicitly required by the contract, which states, under section 8.i:

"Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, each of their Affiliates, contractors, sub-contractors, licensors, licensees, sub-licensees, distributors, contract manufacturers, services providers, clinical trial researchers, third parties to whom Pfizer or BioNTech or whatever of their corresponding Affiliates may straight or indirectly owe an indemnity based on the research ...
"from and against whatsoever and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and other expenses of an investigation or litigation ... arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the Vaccine ..."

Meanwhile, the purchaser must besides continue the terms of the contract confidential for a period of ten years.

Not only does Pfizer accept total indemnification, but there's too a section in the contract titled, "Assumption of Defense past Purchaser," which states that in the event Pfizer suffers losses for which information technology is seeking indemnification, the purchaser

"shall promptly assume carry and command of the defense of such Indemnified Claims on behalf of the Indemnitee with counsel acceptable to Indemnitee(due south), whether or not the Indemnified Claim is rightfully brought."

Ehden notes:

"Pfizer is making sure the country will pay for everything: 'Costs and expenses, including ... fees and disbursements of counsel, incurred by the Indemnitee(s) in connectedness with any Indemnified Claim shall exist reimbursed on a quarterly basis by Purchaser.'"

Buried in the March 17, 2020, Federal Register — the daily journal of the U.Due south. government — in a document titled, "Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Confronting COVID-19," is language that establishes a new COVID-19 vaccine court — similar to the federal vaccine court that already exists.

In the U.S., vaccine makers already savour full indemnity against injuries occurring from this or any other pandemic vaccine under the PREP Human activity. If you're injured by a COVID vaccine (or a select group of other vaccines designated under the act), you'd have to file a compensation claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Plan (CICP), which is funded by U.S. taxpayers via Congressional appropriation to the Section of Health and Human Services (DHHS).

While similar to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), which applies to nonpandemic vaccines, the CICP is even less generous when it comes to compensation. Every bit reported by Dr. Meryl Nass, the maximum payout you can receive — even in cases of permanent inability or death — is $250,000 per person; notwithstanding, you'd have to exhaust your private insurance policy earlier the CICP gives you a dime.

The CICP also has a ane-yr statute of limitations, and so you have to act quickly, which is also difficult since it'southward unknown if long-term effects could occur more than a year later.

Pfizer accused of abuse of power

Every bit is apparent in Pfizer's confidential contract with Albania, the drug giant wants governments to guarantee the visitor will be compensated for whatsoever expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it. Pfizer has too demanded that countries put up sovereign assets , including banking concern reserves, military bases and diplomatic mission buildings, every bit collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 inoculation.

New Delhi-based World Is One News (WION) reported in Feb 2022 that Brazil rejected Pfizer's demands, calling them "calumniating." The demands included that Brazil:

  1. "Waives sovereignty of its assets abroad in favor of Pfizer."
  2. Not employ its domestic laws to the company.
  3. Not penalize Pfizer for vaccine delivery delays.
  4. Exempt Pfizer from all ceremonious liability for side effects.

STAT News also referred to concerns by legal experts, who also suggested Pfizer'due south demands were an abuse of power. Marker Eccleston-Turner, a lecturer in global wellness constabulary at Keele Academy in England, told STAT:

"[Pfizer] is trying to eke out as much profit and minimize its risk at every juncture with this vaccine development and so this vaccine rollout. Now, the vaccine evolution has been heavily subsidized already. And then there'due south very minimal risk for the manufacturer involved at that place."

Signs of COVID vaccine failure, agin effects ascension

Pfizer continues to sign lucrative secret vaccine deals beyond the globe. In June 2021, they signed one of their biggest contracts to date — with the Philippine government for 40 million doses .

Meanwhile, COVID-19 "breakthrough cases," which used to be called vaccine failures, are on the rise. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as of July 19, 5,914 people who had been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 were hospitalized or died from COVID-nineteen.

In the U.1000., as of July 15, 87.5% of the adult population had received one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 67.1% had received two. All the same, symptomatic cases among partially and fully vaccinated are on the rise , with an average of 15,537 new infections a day being detected, a forty% increase from the week earlier.

In a July 19 study from the CDC, the agency also reported that the Vaccine Adverse Consequence Reporting System (VAERS) had received 12,313 reports of death among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine — more doubling from the 6,079 reports of death from the week before.

Soon after the written report, withal, they reverted the number to the 6,079 from the week before, indicating by default that no deaths from the vaccine had occurred that week, raising serious questions about transparency and vaccine safety.

Many other adverse events are likewise appearing, ranging in risks from the biologically active SARS-CoV-2 spike protein used in the vaccine to claret clots, reproductive toxicity and myocarditis ( heart inflammation ). Every bit you tin see in the confidential indemnification agreements, still, even if the vaccine turns out to be a dismal failure — and a risk to curt- and long-term wellness — countries have no recourse, nor does anyone who received the experimental shots.

One question that nosotros should all be asking is this: If the COVID-19 vaccines are, in fact, equally safe and effective equally the manufacturers claim, why practise they require this level of indemnification?

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do non necessarily reflect the views of Children'south Health Defense.